Growth Product Management InternUniShackDelivered

Increased verified listings 15% through trust-first marketplace strategy

Turning competitor research and user outreach into a clear 'how we win' strategy and a prioritized product and growth roadmap for a trust-led, campus-first marketplace.

Role
Growth Product Management Intern
Team
Partnering with product leadership
Timeline
Jun 2025 – Sep 2025 (10 weeks)
Tools
Google Sheets, Figma, basic analytics, email and social pilots
Platform
Web · Mobile
Status
Delivered
Increased verified listings 15% through trust-first marketplace strategy
Overview

A trust-led strategy for a two-sided student housing marketplace

UniShack helps college students find safer housing near campus by prioritizing verified listings and trust signals. I led a 5-competitor analysis across product, trust, pricing, and go-to-market strategy, then paired that with outreach to 300+ students and 40 property managers to define 15 user stories and a trust-first roadmap for marketplace growth. The focus was to increase verified listings and drive more student-to-landlord contact so students can find housing faster and avoid scams.

+15%
Verified Listings
During test window
340+
User Insights Collected
Students + property managers
15
User Stories Created
Turned into build-ready needs
4
Market Gaps Identified
With 9 concrete actions
The Problem

Traffic doesn't equal trust and trust is what matters most

UniShack is a two-sided marketplace. Students need trustworthy housing options. Property managers need qualified student leads. The core risk is scams and low trust, so growth depends on verified supply and clear trust signals. Competitors can win on traffic, but traffic does not equal trust. Students hesitate to act because they do not trust listing quality, and property managers do not finish listings because the value is not clear. This reduces verified supply and slows lead volume.

"UniShack was unlikely to win on traffic alone, so the strategy focused on trust, verification, and local credibility first."

Target Users

Two sides of a marketplace with a shared trust problem

01
Primary User

Student (Renter)

Looking for safe housing near campus fast — but scam fear makes every listing feel risky.

Goals & Needs
  • Find safe, verified housing near campus quickly
  • Build confidence before contacting a landlord
  • Complete a contact without leaving the platform
02
Secondary User

Property Manager (Supplier)

Wants qualified student leads but doesn't see enough value to finish the listing and verification flow.

Goals & Needs
  • Publish a listing quickly with minimal friction
  • Get qualified student leads — not random contacts
  • See proof of value before investing in verification
Success Metrics

What we measure to know it's working

Metrics were structured across three tiers to connect daily actions to the north star outcome.

North Star
Verified leads (student-to-manager contact) per week
Input Metrics
Verified listings added
Signup-to-contact rate (student)
Listing completion rate (property manager)
Referral conversion (manager invites)
Guardrails
Support requests per 100 users (trust and safety signal)
Post-interaction satisfaction rating
Insights

Big platforms win on traffic, UniShack wins on trust

Competitor testing, review mining, and outreach interviews revealed a consistent pattern: students don't distrust UniShack, they just don't have enough proof yet.

Root Cause

UniShack cannot out-rank the big marketplaces today, so pure SEO and paid acquisition won't work. The fastest path is to out-trust them by making verification obvious, building local campus credibility, and adding features that keep students coming back.

Big platforms win on traffic, but they do not win on student trust or student-first workflows

Social platforms pull attention, but they stay unsafe and unverified

UniShack's edge is 'free + verified + campus-first,' but it needs stronger trust cues and local growth loops

Students hesitate to contact landlords when listings lack visible verification signals

Property managers drop off during listing setup when the benefit isn't immediately clear

Insight 1
Gallery 1
Direct, indirect, and general competitors
Approach

Out-trust, don't out-rank

Goal: Increase verified listings and student-to-manager contact by making trust visible before scaling acquisition

Rather than chasing SEO rankings or paid acquisition, the strategy centered on what UniShack could actually win: local trust loops, visible verification, and campus-first community growth.

Product Principles

Make trust visible on every listing

Build campus-by-campus, not nationwide

Use community trust loops before paid growth

Add stickiness so users return while supply grows

Prove value fast for both sides of the marketplace

Hypotheses

If we launch ambassadors and a 'How we verify' page, then verified listings rise because students and landlords see proof and peer trust.

If we add saved search alerts and reviews, then return rate rises because we create repeat reasons to come back.

If listing-side messaging emphasizes verification and qualified demand, listing completion will rise because property managers will see the value sooner.

Strategy
Prioritizing

Why campus trust loops and not SEO or paid ads

Three options were evaluated. The decision came down to what UniShack could credibly win given its current scale and team size.

Option 1: Compete on broad SEORejected
Pros

Scales over time

Cons

Big sites dominate today; slow feedback loop

Option 2: Paid ads to buy demandRejected
Pros

Fast top-of-funnel

Cons

High cost, low trust conversion, weak supply quality

Option 3: Campus trust loops (ambassadors + verification + reviews)Chosen
Pros

Uses UniShack strengths; creates local credibility; lower cost

Cons

Operational effort; needs clear targets and accountability

Final Decision

Center the strategy on 'we cannot out-rank today, so we out-trust,' then build a 0–180 day plan that starts with trust, adds stickiness, and scales demand once the marketplace has quality supply.

How we win
Scope & Roadmap

0–180 day plan: trust → stickiness → demand

Each phase builds on the last. Trust must come first because stickiness and demand only compound once the foundation is solid.

0–30 days: Gain Trust
  • Launch campus ambassador program with targets per ambassador
  • Publish 'How we verify' page and add verified badges to listings
  • Start property manager referral program to grow supply
  • Add reviews flow to strengthen social proof
30–90 days: Add Stickiness
  • Roommate matching feature to widen job-to-be-done
  • Campus guides for each target school
  • Saved-search alerts via email and SMS
90–180 days: Scale Demand
  • One-page landlord intake with incentives
  • Referral loops for both sides
  • Light monetization tests
Out of Scope
  • Nationwide expansion
  • Heavy paid acquisition
  • Full mobile app build (flagged as a weakness, not the first move)
Milestones
01

Discovery: competitor testing, review mining, funnel mapping

02

Spec and alignment: scoring system, SWOT, positioning, 'how we win'

03

Pilots: IG and email messaging tests

04

Roadmap: 0–30, 30–90, 90–180 execution plan

Execution

Three research methods that shaped every recommendation

Each method answered a different question, the competitor matrix showed the market, outreach showed the users, and the pilots tested the message.

01

Five-Competitor Analysis & Scoring Matrix

Competitive Research

Built a structured scoring system across Listings/Search, User Tools, Marketing/Outreach, Pricing model, and Support/Safety. Compared UniShack to direct, benchmark, and indirect competitors. The matrix made the tradeoff visible: Big sites = scale, not trust. Niche sites = student-focused but lack reach. Social = popular but unsafe. UniShack = free, student-first, verified.

OUTPUT

Competitor matrix, positioning map, SWOT, and 'how we win' strategy with 4 market gaps and 9 concrete actions.

Step 1 image 1
02

User Outreach & Story Mapping

Qualitative Research

Contacted 300+ students and 40+ property managers to learn where onboarding and listing setup failed. Logged every friction point and confusion moment. Wrote 15 user stories to turn outreach into build-ready needs tied directly to MVP choices.

OUTPUT

15 user stories that bridged raw feedback and product decisions.

03

Instagram & Email Messaging Pilots

Growth Experiments

Planned and ran messaging pilots that tested trust-first copy angles — comparing speed messaging versus scam avoidance messaging to identify which framing drove more listing completions and signups.

OUTPUT

Messaging results summary with winning angles and recommended copy direction for the next campaign.

Instagram Post Pilot
Instagram Post Pilot
Email Newsletter Pilot
Email Newsletter Pilot
Launch Plan

What I handed off and how it rolls out

The handoff was built for a small team, everything was concrete, sequenced, and tied to a metric.

Spec Highlights

Competitor matrix and positioning map (general → student-specific, unverified → verified)

'How we win' pillars: free + verified, student-first, community growth, lean model

KPI ladder: awareness → engagement → supply → trust → retention

Next-step backlog with concrete feature bets (alerts, reviews, roommate matching, landlord intake)

Comms

Weekly share-outs to align on targets, learnings, and the next experiment queue.

Rollout
0–30 days

Ambassadors, verification page, trust badges, reviews, and early alerts

30–90 days

Roommate matching, campus guides, saved-search alerts via email and SMS

90–180 days

One-page landlord intake with incentives, referral loops, light monetization tests

Risk Plan

Track trust signals and support load as growth increases. Keep verification standards high to avoid supply growth that harms trust.

Launch plan
Results

Early pilots showed both sides of the marketplace responding

My outreach work helped identify why users dropped off and turned raw feedback into 15 user stories that supported MVP planning. Most importantly, the work gave the team a shared language for what to measure next.

Observed in Pilots
+15%
Verified Listings
During the test window
8.0% → 10.4%
Signup-to-Contact Rate
+2.4pp · +30% in 4 weeks
Strategy Output
Competitive analysis with 4 market gaps and 9 actions designed to raise verified leads by 20%
Reusable competitor framework the team used for near-term decisions
340+ user insights collected from students and property managers
15 user stories that bridged qualitative outreach and MVP planning
0–180 day roadmap used directly in next-step planning
Reflection

Fast drafts beat perfect answers in a startup

I learned to balance depth with speed. In a startup, a strong draft now often beats a perfect answer later — fast drafts are rewarded with fast feedback. I had to stop over-researching and iterate sooner. The competitor matrix went through four versions in two weeks, and each version was more useful than the last precisely because it got in front of the team early. Next time, I would start benchmarking earlier and standardize the metric tracking plan before running campaigns — so every pilot produces clean signal.

When you can't out-rank, you out-trust, and trust compounds faster than traffic.

Get in Touch

Let's connect and create together

I'm always open to conversations, collaborations, and interesting opportunities about product and growth.

© Liana Ngo · 2026Made with intention
.gp2-mc, .gp2-pc, .gp2-step { border: 1.5px solid rgba(99,102,241,0.20) !important; }